<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Startup-Growth on Scholion</title><link>https://scholion.thluiz.com/tags/startup-growth/</link><description>Recent content in Startup-Growth on Scholion</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>pt-BR</language><copyright>© 2026</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2026 12:03:59 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://scholion.thluiz.com/tags/startup-growth/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Budding vs. splitting: A better model for growing an engineering org</title><link>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/budding-vs-splitting-a-better-model-for-growing-an-engineeri/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2026 11:53:14 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/budding-vs-splitting-a-better-model-for-growing-an-engineeri/</guid><description>The post argues that early engineering orgs should grow by budding, not by splitting evenly. Stable work should get small dedicated teams, while the core team stays flexible until the shape of the work is clear.</description></item></channel></rss>