<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hegel on Scholion</title><link>https://scholion.thluiz.com/tags/hegel/</link><description>Recent content in Hegel on Scholion</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>pt-BR</language><copyright>© 2026</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 21:26:22 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://scholion.thluiz.com/tags/hegel/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Whether this is the tone of a thinker wanting to instruct or that of a charlatan wanting to impress</title><link>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/schopenhauer-fichte-schelling-hegel-charlatane/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 20:44:52 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/schopenhauer-fichte-schelling-hegel-charlatane/</guid><description>De Parerga und Paralipomena I, Skizze einer Geschichte der Lehre (1851). Schopenhauer ataca Fichte, Schelling e Hegel como charlatães do idealismo pós-kantiano.</description></item><item><title>Toda determinação é negação (Hegel, lendo Spinoza)</title><link>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/toda-determinacao-e-negacao-hegel-lendo-spinoza/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:56:41 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/toda-determinacao-e-negacao-hegel-lendo-spinoza/</guid><description>A fórmula &amp;rsquo;toda determinação é negação&amp;rsquo; é reformulação de Hegel (1816). Spinoza escreveu apenas &amp;lsquo;determinatio negatio est&amp;rsquo; na Carta 50 a Jarig Jelles, sobre figuras geométricas.</description></item><item><title>Ideology as controlled hallucination — but socially</title><link>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/ideology-as-controlled-hallucination-socially/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 23:59:16 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/ideology-as-controlled-hallucination-socially/</guid><description>Reframing Anil Seth&amp;rsquo;s cognitive theory as ideology critique: reality is a construction, but the feedback loop runs through the symbolic order, not an individual brain.</description></item><item><title>Subjectivity requires the impenetrable other</title><link>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/subjectivity-requires-the-impenetrable-other/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 23:41:16 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/subjectivity-requires-the-impenetrable-other/</guid><description>With Hegel, Freud and Lacan: a subject emerges only through encounter with another subjectivity whose interiority is a priori opaque.</description></item></channel></rss>