<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Feedback on Scholion</title><link>https://scholion.thluiz.com/tags/feedback/</link><description>Recent content in Feedback on Scholion</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>pt-BR</language><copyright>© 2026</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 20:10:34 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://scholion.thluiz.com/tags/feedback/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Hate Your Own Work and Ship It Anyway</title><link>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/hate-your-own-work-and-ship-it-anyway/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:29:59 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/hate-your-own-work-and-ship-it-anyway/</guid><description>&lt;p>Aaron Stannard argues that self-criticism and shipping are not in tension, they depend on each other. Being harshly critical of your own work before anyone else sees it prepares you to hear negative feedback without being destabilized by it, and it starts the improvement process before the work ever reaches a user. Withholding a flawed product to keep refining it in isolation just delays contact with real users, the only test that matters.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>The beauty and terror of negative feedback</title><link>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/the-beauty-and-terror-of-negative-feedback/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 13:51:08 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/the-beauty-and-terror-of-negative-feedback/</guid><description>A first conference talk gets mostly praise, then a bare anonymous 4/10 review. Amanda Mayfield traces why it stung and turns the discomfort into a plan to redesign the talk.</description></item></channel></rss>