<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Comprehension-Debt on Scholion</title><link>https://scholion.thluiz.com/tags/comprehension-debt/</link><description>Recent content in Comprehension-Debt on Scholion</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>pt-BR</language><copyright>© 2026</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 20:10:34 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://scholion.thluiz.com/tags/comprehension-debt/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Programming Languages in the Age of AI Agents</title><link>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/programming-languages-in-the-age-of-ai-agents/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:31:46 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/programming-languages-in-the-age-of-ai-agents/</guid><description>If AI agents write the code, does language choice still matter? Alexandru Nedelcu argues static typing sharpens the agent&amp;rsquo;s feedback loop, but comprehension debt stays a human problem.</description></item></channel></rss>