https://scholion.thluiz.com/tags/code-review/Recent content in Code-Review on ScholionHugo -- gohugo.iopt-BR© 2026Wed, 23 Sep 2026 20:10:34 +0100https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/continuous-ai-in-software-engineering/Wed, 23 Sep 2026 18:11:00 +0100https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/continuous-ai-in-software-engineering/Sean Goedecke argues AI should be used like tests and types, continuously and automatically, not as an on-demand oracle a developer has to remember to consult.https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/every-layer-of-review-makes-you-10x-slower/Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:55:07 +0100https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/every-layer-of-review-makes-you-10x-slower/Avery Pennarun argues AI coding speed doesn’t fix engineering velocity because review layers, not typing speed, are the bottleneck, and draws on Deming’s quality theory to argue for eliminating review stages, not stacking more of them.https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/ai-writes-code-faster-your-job-is-still-to-prove/Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:30:44 +0100https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/ai-writes-code-faster-your-job-is-still-to-prove/Osmani’s framework for code review after AI: solo devs lean on tests as a safety net, teams need a PR Contract stating intent, proof, risk, and where to focus review.https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/the-slow-and-quiet-cognitive-atrophy/Wed, 23 Sep 2026 13:51:08 +0100https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/the-slow-and-quiet-cognitive-atrophy/AI-generated code looks clean and its own tests pass, but skipping the review step quietly erodes an engineer’s own skill. Elmar Chavez traces the decay and argues discipline is what keeps understanding intact.