<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Backbone on Scholion</title><link>https://scholion.thluiz.com/tags/backbone/</link><description>Recent content in Backbone on Scholion</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>pt-BR</language><copyright>© 2026</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:13:00 -0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://scholion.thluiz.com/tags/backbone/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Common Backbone Patterns Simplified with Marionette</title><link>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/common-backbone-patterns-simplified-with-marionette/</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:13:00 -0300</pubDate><guid>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/common-backbone-patterns-simplified-with-marionette/</guid><description>The post shows how Marionette reduces Backbone boilerplate for nested views and view swapping, using CollectionView, ItemView, Layout, and Regions to manage rendering and cleanup.</description></item><item><title>Spine.js vs Backbone.js</title><link>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/spine-js-vs-backbone-js/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 16:29:06 -0300</pubDate><guid>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/spine-js-vs-backbone-js/</guid><description>The page compares Spine and Backbone on basics, async UI behavior, models, attributes, identifiers, storage, helpers, views/controllers, architecture, and ends by recommending Spine for simplicity or CoffeeScript integration, Backbone otherwise.</description></item></channel></rss>