#Anarchy
5 notas · última:
Is anarchy compatible with modern society?
The post argues that anarchy already scales in wide, decentralized forms, and that its real limits come from capitalism’s global reach, not from Dunbar’s number or human size alone.
How could anarchy prevent bad people from taking control?
The piece argues that anarchy would reduce the conditions that produce violent, power-hungry people, while weakening the systems that lift them into power. It also rejects common arguments about commons, prisoners’ dilemmas, and free riders.
May all roads lead to solarpunk - by Peter Clayborne
Peter Clayborne argues that anarchy means removing control, not managing it better. He contrasts social revolution with reform, rejects top-down safety, and frames a freer world as already within reach.
Paths to Peace
The letter argues that peace does not require police, prisons, or courts. It points to Rotuman, Zapotec, Semai, and Norwegian examples to show how nonviolent childrearing, mediation, and social norms shape conflict resolution.
The hope of anarchy
Peter Clayborne argues that anarchy is a practical hope for richer social relations, less coercion, and forms of life that can scale beyond state and border logics.