<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>.Net on Scholion</title><link>https://scholion.thluiz.com/tags/.net/</link><description>Recent content in .Net on Scholion</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>pt-BR</language><copyright>© 2026</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 13:21:28 -0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://scholion.thluiz.com/tags/.net/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Why I Left the .NET Framework</title><link>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/why-i-left-the-dot-net-framework/</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 13:21:28 -0300</pubDate><guid>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/why-i-left-the-dot-net-framework/</guid><description>The author says .NET was strong, but its defaults narrowed choice, pushed developers inward, and kept implementation details ahead of the model and business behavior.</description></item><item><title>Why Managed Code Is Safer</title><link>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/why-managed-code-is-safer/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:44:46 -0300</pubDate><guid>https://scholion.thluiz.com/notes/why-managed-code-is-safer/</guid><description>The page contrasts unmanaged and managed code, explaining that managed environments add safety, portability, garbage collection, and shared framework libraries at some cost in performance.</description></item></channel></rss>