Will Vibe Coding Kill LowCode - DEV Community

AI will change LowCode tools, but the author argues it will not replace the Power Platform in the near term. He says the main limits are cost, inconsistent outputs, security, technical debt, and the fact that many people still prefer graphical UI over typing prompts.

Reading notes

#

• AI is expensive, and the article compares Power Automate runs with Agent Flow usage to show a much higher per-run cost for AI-based flows.
• The shift from flat-rate licensing to pay-as-you-go or token packs makes budgeting less predictable and increases the risk of surprise bills.
• AI works well with messy inputs, but that same flexibility makes deterministic results harder, which matters for finance, governance, and compliance.
• Adoption is slowed by existing skills, documentation, legacy flows, and the cost of moving people away from tools they already use.
• Security is presented as a major concern because LLM systems are hard to secure, can be vulnerable to prompt injection, and blur the boundary between input and command.
• The author says vibe coding can create technical debt when people can build without fully understanding the code and later need to debug it.
• Many users still prefer visual interfaces, so the article doubts that most developers will want to replace drag-and-drop design with natural-language prompts.
• The author thinks the Power Platform’s community value depends on learning and mastery, and that removing that challenge could weaken the ecosystem.
• The preferred future is AI embedded inside the platform, not AI replacing the platform, with generated components constrained inside components to reduce debt and security risk.