Socratic Questioning - "Meetings are a waste of time"

Socratic questioning is presented as a way to dig deeper into problems and ideas by asking targeted questions. In the example claim that meetings are a waste of time, the framework is used to clarify what kind of meetings are being discussed, test assumptions, ask for evidence, look at other viewpoints, and explore what happens if meetings are removed.

Reading notes

#

• It is a discussion style led by questions that helps people think in new ways and explore different perspectives.
• The example starts by clarifying what kind of meetings are being criticized, because the complaint can mean different things.
• It then asks whether the claim is always true and what assumptions support it.
• It asks what evidence exists for the belief that meetings waste time and how that evidence could be checked.
• It looks at how managers, developers, and other colleagues may value meetings differently.
• It considers the consequences of removing meetings and the tradeoffs between synchronous and asynchronous communication.
• The method also asks whether answering the questions changes anything for the audience.
• The five steps listed are clarifying the idea, challenging assumptions, looking for evidence, changing perspectives, and exploring consequences.