Hate Your Own Work and Ship It Anyway

Aaron Stannard argues that self-criticism and shipping are not in tension, they depend on each other. Being harshly critical of your own work before anyone else sees it prepares you to hear negative feedback without being destabilized by it, and it starts the improvement process before the work ever reaches a user. Withholding a flawed product to keep refining it in isolation just delays contact with real users, the only test that matters.

He grounds this in the parable of the ceramics class from Art & Fear (David Bayles and Ted Orland), where the group graded on quantity produced the best pots, because they were iterating and learning from mistakes while the group graded on a single “perfect” pot spent the term theorizing instead of making.

Fichamento

#

• The core advice given to team members taking on more ownership: “hate your own work product and still ship it anyway.”
• Two reasons to ship despite known flaws: self-criticism opens you up to feedback and starts improvement early, and only shipping lets you test whether your assumptions about the work’s quality were correct.
• Paraphrasing Bill Gates, users (including unhappy ones) are the real source of learning, and that only happens once the product leaves the dry dock.
• The Art & Fear ceramics class parable: students graded on quantity of pots produced the highest-quality work, while students graded on a single “perfect” pot ended up with theories and no results.
• Theorizing about the perfect feature, graphic, or copy is a waste of time; only market testing validates or invalidates the work.
• “Hate your own work” holds two things together: pride in the work, and active anticipation of its flaws and likely criticism.
• People who are overly proud of their own work (“sock sniffers”) are unprepared for real feedback, argue with users and colleagues, and eventually falter regardless of talent.
• The author applies this to himself: holding critical opinions in advance of his own performance, roadmap decisions, and conference talks.
• Self-criticism doubles as a coping mechanism for criticism (you’ve already agreed with the critique) and as a channel for continuous improvement.
• The goal is a “Goldilocks Zone” balancing pride in the work with ongoing self-criticism, informed by internal and external recognition of progress.