Effective Steps to reduce technical debt: An agile approach

The post says agile made technical debt more visible, but did not solve it. It presents a practical process for a Kanban team: make the product owner sponsor the effort, collect and structure known problems, estimate them in relative terms, and work debt reduction into the normal development flow.

Reading notes

#

• Technical debt gained visibility through agile, but the post says weak agile setups can make it worse.
• Common preventive practices such as TDD, pair programming, and continuous refactoring are accepted, yet the author says systematic approaches for larger systems are still rare.
• The team faced recurring issues: unclear responsibility, feature-first planning, low product-owner awareness, and poor documentation of debt.
• The first step is to involve the product owner and make that person the sponsor of technical debt reduction.
• The product owner should help surface technical topics and take part in prioritizing them while keeping long-term product health in view.
• The second step is to inventory known technical problems and map them onto the system and project landscape.
• The team used cards, a whiteboard, and post-its gathered from wiki, Jira, Confluence, code documentation, and paper notes.
• The board remained open for several days so team members could complete, restructure, and correct it.
• The third step is to prioritize and estimate the work with abstract units rather than exact numbers.
• The post uses TechDollar for debt size and animal sizes for effort size, then compares items by benefit and effort.
• The aim is to build a shared sense of relative size and decide what should come first.
• The fourth step is to visualize the data in JIRA and show how repayment relates to effort.
• The chart helped the team see that much of the perceived debt could be reduced with a relatively small effort.
• The visualization also gave the product owner and other stakeholders more transparency.
• The fifth step is to integrate debt reduction into the existing development process.
• Bigger technical stories are included in feature planning and development.
• Smaller stories are done spontaneously by developers using their 20 percent tech and innovation time.
• New debt is collected on a wiki page, reviewed quarterly, and discussed in retrospectives every other week.
• The conclusion says technical debt is normal and should be handled in a structured way by the development team.